Feature

Third Generation TP Monitors Are Better

Are you living under the misconception that transactions cannot scale?  We often hear in our conversations with the market that transaction managers are supposed to be centralized, and create unwanted and unnecessary overhead for two-phase commit and synchronization. In this blog post , Atomikos CTO Guy Pardon takes aim at these misconceptions and argues that third generation transaction monitors are as good as (or better than) the alternatives.  What do you think?  Let us know via our LinkedIn forum. 

Other News

Why Use Atomikos?

1. Transaction management and connection pooling using J2SE
2. Ease of use
3. Real recovery right out of the box
4. Optimized for JDBC and JMS
5. Professional support from transaction experts
6. A pragmatic feature set
7. Superior design
8. Minimal dependencies
9. Open source
10. Mature technology
11. Freedom from the app server
12. Market proven

To learn more about these reasons, and more about Atomikos transaction management technology, go here.

Early Adopters Wanted - Transactions for REST

We have been working on the concept of transactions for REST and came up with a revolutionary idea that (unlike XA, CORBA, or WS-AT) requires NO technical coupling whatsoever. Transaction properties just follow naturally.  We'll soon have an academic paper published on the topic, and in the meantime, are actively seeing early adopters for a first implementation of such a transactional RESTful business process.  Contact us at info@atomikos.com if you would like to participate. 

Our XA compatibility suite capability is growing!

We are writing an XA compatibility suite that will allow users to verify their own infrastructure's XA capabilities.  To access the new test suite, contact CTO Guy Pardon guy@atomikos.com

Back to top